From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
To: "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>, 程洋 <chengyang@xiaomi.com>
Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
何浩 <hehao@xiaomi.com>, "Xin7 Ma 马鑫" <maxin7@xiaomi.com>,
石奉兵 <shifengbing@xiaomi.com>, 凡军辉 <fanjunhui@xiaomi.com>,
王汉基 <wanghanji@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] parse_object(): allow skipping hash check
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:15:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f79b0ccd-3e36-f447-0dbb-6e40ad547c8d@github.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YxfRTubqh7aFvNJs@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On 9/6/2022 7:01 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> I'm sorry, I know the argument here is really hand-wavy. But I really
> think this isn't making anything much less safe.
I agree with you that this is the safest way to move forward here.
> I was actually tempted to rip out the blob hash-check entirely by
> default! Anybody who really cares about checking the bits can do so
> with read_object_file(). That's what fsck does, and we could pretty
> easily convert "rev-list --verify-objects" to do so, too. So this is the
> less extreme version of the patch. ;)
A quick search shows many uses of parse_object() across the codebase.
It would certainly be nice if they all suddenly got faster by avoiding
this hashing, but I also suppose that most of the calls are using
parse_object() only because they are unsure if they are parsing a
commit or a tag and would never parse a large blob.
I think this approach of making parse_object_with_flags() is the best
way to incrementally approach things here. If we decide that we need
the _with_flags() version specifically to avoid this hash check, then
we could probably take the second approach: remove the hash check from
parse_object() and swap the places that care to use read_object_file()
instead. My guess is that in the long term there will be fewer swaps
to read_object_file() than to parse_object_with_flags().
However, this is a good first step to make progress without doing the
time-consuming audit of every caller to parse_object().
Thanks,
-Stolee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-07 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-11 8:09 Partial-clone cause big performance impact on server 程洋
2022-08-11 17:22 ` Jonathan Tan
2022-08-13 7:55 ` 回复: [External Mail]Re: " 程洋
2022-08-13 11:41 ` 程洋
2022-08-15 5:16 ` ZheNing Hu
2022-08-15 13:15 ` 程洋
2022-08-12 12:21 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-08-14 6:48 ` Jeff King
2022-08-15 13:18 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-08-15 14:50 ` [External Mail]Re: " 程洋
2022-08-17 10:22 ` 程洋
2022-08-17 13:41 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-08-18 5:49 ` Jeff King
2022-09-01 6:53 ` 程洋
2022-09-01 16:19 ` Jeff King
2022-09-05 11:17 ` 程洋
2022-09-06 18:38 ` Jeff King
2022-09-06 22:58 ` [PATCH 0/3] speeding up on-demand fetch for blobs in partial clone Jeff King
2022-09-06 23:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] parse_object(): allow skipping hash check Jeff King
2022-09-07 14:15 ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2022-09-07 20:44 ` Jeff King
2022-09-06 23:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] upload-pack: skip parse-object re-hashing of "want" objects Jeff King
2022-09-07 14:36 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-09-07 14:45 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-09-07 20:50 ` Jeff King
2022-09-07 19:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-09-07 20:36 ` Jeff King
2022-09-07 20:48 ` [BUG] t1800: Fails for error text comparison rsbecker
2022-09-07 21:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-09-07 22:23 ` rsbecker
2022-09-07 21:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] upload-pack: skip parse-object re-hashing of "want" objects Jeff King
2022-09-07 22:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-09-08 5:04 ` Jeff King
2022-09-08 16:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-09-06 23:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] parse_object(): check commit-graph when skip_hash set Jeff King
2022-09-07 14:46 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-09-07 19:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-09-08 10:39 ` [External Mail]Re: " 程洋
2022-09-08 18:42 ` Jeff King
2022-09-07 14:48 ` [PATCH 0/3] speeding up on-demand fetch for blobs in partial clone Derrick Stolee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f79b0ccd-3e36-f447-0dbb-6e40ad547c8d@github.com \
--to=derrickstolee@github.com \
--cc=chengyang@xiaomi.com \
--cc=fanjunhui@xiaomi.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hehao@xiaomi.com \
--cc=maxin7@xiaomi.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=shifengbing@xiaomi.com \
--cc=wanghanji@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).