git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russ Dill" <russ.dill@gmail.com>
To: Mike <fromlists@talkingspider.com>
Cc: "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: I don't want the .git directory next to my code.
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:27:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9d2a5e10801220227i6dfb6185g555911f0d999fa60@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <478FA8B0.2000205@talkingspider.com>

> Linus posted a response about deployment and development being
> separated, so I had to point out why that doesn't work for web apps in
> interpreted languages.
>

If your primary concern is preventing information leakage, then a
publish model is absolutely what you want. You definetely don't want
some random intermediary file out on the server, or some file that was
never checked into source control.

By publish, I don't just mean to the public server, I also mean to
whatever development roots you have.

With a good publishing model and a good SCM, you also get
reproducibility and testability as well. Its easy to ensure that what
is checked into source control is what you are testing, and its easy
to rollback production servers to a different version.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-01-22 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-16  3:27 I don't want the .git directory next to my code Mike
2008-01-16  3:50 ` Randal L. Schwartz
2008-01-16  4:07   ` Mike
2008-01-16  4:24     ` David Symonds
2008-01-16  4:29       ` Mike
2008-01-16  4:36     ` Sean
2008-01-16 17:31       ` Mike
2008-01-16  5:27     ` Neil Macneale
2008-01-16 17:23       ` Mike
2008-01-16 17:51         ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-16 18:15         ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-16 18:25           ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-17  5:42             ` Mike
2008-01-17  6:38               ` Kris Shannon
2008-01-17 10:34               ` Wincent Colaiuta
2008-01-17 15:17               ` Jeff King
2008-01-17 17:36                 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-17 17:49                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-17 18:02                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-17 18:10                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-17 19:12                 ` Mike
2008-01-17 19:20                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-17 20:00                     ` Mike
2008-01-17 20:08                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-17 20:49                         ` Mike
2008-01-17 20:57                           ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-17 21:00                             ` Mike
2008-01-17 21:05                               ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-18  7:52                   ` David Symonds
2008-01-22 10:27                   ` Russ Dill [this message]
2008-01-17 21:05               ` Martin Langhoff
2008-01-18  8:41               ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-01-16 19:23           ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-17  2:00           ` Ping Yin
2008-01-17  2:38             ` Linus Torvalds
2008-01-16  3:56 ` Dan McGee
2008-01-16  6:00   ` Mike
2008-01-16  6:07     ` Mike Krier
2008-01-16  6:09     ` Mike
2008-01-16  4:03 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-01-16  4:06 ` David Symonds
2008-01-16  4:18   ` Mike
2008-01-16  4:44     ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-01-16  4:55     ` Luke Lu
2008-01-16 17:23       ` Mike
2008-01-17  1:42     ` Sam Vilain
2008-01-16  4:13 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-01-16  4:24   ` Mike
2008-01-16 10:37     ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-16 13:21   ` Bert Wesarg
2008-01-16 22:33   ` Wayne Davison
2008-01-16  9:59 ` Matthieu Moy
2008-01-16 10:36   ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-16 11:41     ` Bill Lear
2008-01-16 12:25       ` Matthieu Moy
2008-01-16 12:45         ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-16 17:40           ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-16 17:52             ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-16 11:59     ` Matthieu Moy
2008-01-16 12:12       ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-16 13:13 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-01-17  0:59   ` Brian Downing
2008-01-17  1:35     ` Randal L. Schwartz
2008-01-17  2:59       ` Martin Langhoff
2008-01-17  5:44         ` Randal L. Schwartz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f9d2a5e10801220227i6dfb6185g555911f0d999fa60@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=russ.dill@gmail.com \
    --cc=fromlists@talkingspider.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).