Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2010, #06; Wed, 20)

[Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>]

Heya,

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 01:52, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> * jh/notes (2010-01-17) 23 commits
>  - builtin-gc: Teach the new --notes option to garbage-collect notes
>  - Notes API: gc_notes(): Prune notes that belong to non-existing objects
>  - t3305: Verify that removing notes triggers automatic fanout consolidation
>  - builtin-notes: Teach -d option for deleting existing notes
>  - Teach builtin-notes to remove empty notes
>  - Teach notes code to properly preserve non-notes in the notes tree
>  - t3305: Verify that adding many notes with git-notes triggers increased fanout
>  - t3301: Verify successful annotation of non-commits
>  - Builtin-ify git-notes
>  - Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes
>  - Notes API: Allow multiple concurrent notes trees with new struct notes_tree
>  - Notes API: write_notes_tree(): Store the notes tree in the database
>  - Notes API: for_each_note(): Traverse the entire notes tree with a callback
>  - Notes API: get_note(): Return the note annotating the given object
>  - Notes API: remove_note(): Remove note objects from the notes tree structure
>  - Notes API: add_note(): Add note objects to the internal notes tree structure
>  - Notes API: init_notes(): Initialize the notes tree from the given notes ref
>  - Add tests for checking correct handling of $GIT_NOTES_REF and core.notesRef
>  - Notes API: get_commit_notes() -> format_note() + remove the commit restriction
>  - Minor non-functional fixes to notes.c
>  (merged to 'next' on 2010-01-02 at ae42130)
>  + Add more testcases to test fast-import of notes
>  + Rename t9301 to t9350, to make room for more fast-import tests
>  + fast-import: Proper notes tree manipulation
>
> Updated with a re-roll.

Just checking, you reverted all from next (with exception of the first
three), and now re-queued it to pu, with the first three still in
next? Or did I mis-remember and did only the first three make it to
next in the first place?

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier