From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sverre Rabbelier Subject: Patchdiff Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:06:07 +0100 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 To: Git List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 27 01:06:46 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NZvQj-0004Tc-Jq for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:06:46 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755820Ab0A0AGc (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:06:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754941Ab0A0AG3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:06:29 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f189.google.com ([209.85.222.189]:39485 "EHLO mail-pz0-f189.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754697Ab0A0AG1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:06:27 -0500 Received: by pzk27 with SMTP id 27so1112556pzk.33 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:06:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=hcT3ZsBliF+zrBxGx7UpkN2Wq+aHSaafCEp8iRj0U7I=; b=ciQ96hz3ZzDX7BP3EZJbiX4vRwJodfXgGo1vxmyXW7fjEvrLHJ1nrPOpIeh8oehtyI HQzs0jyC9oRWNpsED+reIghXGrTHk2nZT74k8D52SPaZLW9AvyBELXaVzydJGsBydnNJ HEyPlbsxAqzbaVWuXrXjnPP36BknmGA7T44EQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=P0CslsrE2Gf1kyibBS9PKZeZBx8qGPLUylE56RRErvBp/M9VP2WC4a04+U8dgtxs1x b1jwvbu26a4Iy3c9BWHQMsNdEOsIDK+8X+57QiKXWD9V79QqsfEVguIGBvdCPRoac8gg pQvQ6vYSk59pCGcEhpdmXF0yCzm6VCXtuC9X8= Received: by 10.142.7.9 with SMTP id 9mr1107370wfg.149.1264550787130; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:06:27 -0800 (PST) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Heya, Do we have anything that allows me to compare two versions of a patch? In theory it'd do something like "apply both patches to the their merge base, then show the diff between the results". I don't think we have something like that, since there's probably some major caveats about conflicts when applying the patches to their merge-base. Or perhaps my theory is silly, and there's an easier way to compare two patches (other than looking at a diff's diff, which I've never been good at). -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier