From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change options to alphabetical order Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:21:57 +0200 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <6431frn5.fsf@cante.net> <7vps19l7dl.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Aug 28 01:49:24 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IPnuO-0007jD-JO for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:22:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751184AbXH0XWI (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:22:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751150AbXH0XWH (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:22:07 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:54561 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750770AbXH0XWG (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:22:06 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IPnuE-0002D5-W8 for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:22:03 +0200 Received: from host-89-229-8-65.torun.mm.pl ([89.229.8.65]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:22:02 +0200 Received: from jnareb by host-89-229-8-65.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:22:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-89-229-8-65.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: Jakub Narebski User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > This might make sense but I do not want a patch only to git-tag > and I certainly do not want it right now. > > If it makes sense to reorder in alphabetical order, we would > want to do so for everybody at once. I'd rather have options sorted by topic than alphabetically. It reads nicer that way (although with alphabetical it is I guess easier to find a meaning of an option). -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git