From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" Subject: Re: Clueless bisect error message Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:30:20 +0700 Message-ID: References: <7vpsczuxj9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v1wpfuv9d.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 11 10:30:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXZTv-00058j-7M for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:30:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965170AbWJKIaW (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:30:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965171AbWJKIaW (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:30:22 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.235]:7336 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965170AbWJKIaV (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Oct 2006 04:30:21 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s14so146945wxc for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:30:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cN5AqA0VgRjBE1Kmbo4CsCsuaKQWjL154gRpquqoi5CQEhoWW4UW8/atmolnepf514FDEXuP0aVhcWDzn5gZvoRYjM8EobiSO+oMF45AN058L7vj3J3A48m2ikTnhJF5g1Bza5iCbdKiysKiC+e4BMzeA2QH/V4A8RIt4tb/qUo= Received: by 10.70.97.13 with SMTP id u13mr245009wxb; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.46.13 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 01:30:20 -0700 (PDT) To: "Junio C Hamano" In-Reply-To: <7v1wpfuv9d.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 10/11/06, Junio C Hamano wrote: > My point actually was that even a simple rewording is harder > than it seems, because that cluelessness actually was introduced > to help Cogito. If we do not care about it, we can just reword > it to say "Hey you are in the middle of another bisect, or maybe > you left your bisect by doing git-checkout earlier? In either > case git-bisect --reset is your friend, oh, and we can run that > for you now if you want". We could even remove head-name in > git-checkout when we see one. > > But I suspect that doing either of these things would harm > Cogito users. After cg-seek the user is not "in the middle of > another bisect", and if we run "git bisect --reset" when we see > head-name, it would probably break it too. Thanks. Now I understand the issue. I'm sorry for my ignorant because I haven't used cogito yet. -- Duy