From: "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: "Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] http-push: Avoid calling setup_git_directory() twice
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:12:38 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcaeb9bf0803110912n480d8f42kde0956609519de83@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.1.00.0803111604240.3873@racer.site>
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Johannes Schindelin
> > <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2 Mar 2008, Nguyn Thái Ng÷c Duy wrote:
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nguyn Thái Ng÷c Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
>
> > >
> > > This fix is completely independent of the rest of your series.
> >
> > Not really. It would have no impact (good or bad) if sent separately.
> > But it is required by the series (otherwise it would die() under certain
> > condition because prefix cannot be recomputed properly).
>
> Well, it _is_ independent. Either you say "we want to have this as an
> example where you can call setup_git_directory() twice" (which I would not
> find all that bad), or you say "this was calling setup_git_directory()
> twice, fix that".
>
> In any case, it should be separate from this series.
My point stands still. It is merely cleanup without harm or goodness
if seperated from the series. This patch does not fix the real
problem.
> Back to the subject of this series: as I stated already, I do not like the
> separation of work-tree and git directory, and I especially do not like
> how much you had to work outside setup.c. I think changing the semantics
> for all callers was not necessary, and in fact, not desirable.
For one, setup_work_tree() prototype change is necessary to deal with
(gitdir autodetection + core.worktree + setup_work_tree()).
For setup_*gently() changes, I think I can make
setup_git_directory_gently() retain its current semantics by removing
06/10 and 07/10. But I do think it's nice to have setup_*_gently()
does things gently _and_ easily-predictable (current _gently() setups
worktree under certain conditions and not otherwise, which I consider
uneasily-predictable). Patch 06 and 07 are mainly cleanup as a result
from _gently() changes. Are those most intrusive to you?
> Ciao,
> Dscho
>
--
Duy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-11 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1204453703.git.pclouds@gmail.com>
2008-03-02 10:33 ` [PATCH 01/10] "git read-tree -m" and the like require worktree Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2008-03-11 13:02 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-11 14:57 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-03-11 15:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-11 15:41 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-03-02 10:33 ` [PATCH 02/10] Make sure setup_git_directory is called before accessing repository Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2008-03-02 10:33 ` [PATCH 03/10] Make get_git_dir() and 'git rev-parse --git-dir' absolute path Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2008-03-11 13:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-11 15:06 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-03-11 15:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-11 15:39 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-03-11 16:20 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-02 10:34 ` [PATCH 04/10] Make setup_work_tree() return new prefix Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2008-03-11 13:27 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-11 15:18 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-03-02 10:34 ` [PATCH 05/10] http-push: Avoid calling setup_git_directory() twice Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2008-03-11 13:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-11 14:54 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-03-11 15:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-11 16:12 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [this message]
2008-03-02 10:34 ` [PATCH 06/10] Completely move out worktree setup from setup_git_directory_gently() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2008-03-11 13:31 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-11 15:28 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-03-11 16:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-02 10:34 ` [PATCH 07/10] builtin-archive: mark unused prefix "unused_prefix" Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2008-03-11 13:33 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-03-11 14:50 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-03-11 15:38 ` Jay Soffian
2008-03-11 16:21 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-03-02 10:35 ` [PATCH 08/10] Make setup_git_directory() auto-setup worktree if found Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2008-03-02 10:35 ` [PATCH 09/10] Documentation: update api-builtin and api-setup Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2008-03-02 10:35 ` [PATCH 10/10] Additional tests to capture worktree special cases Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fcaeb9bf0803110912n480d8f42kde0956609519de83@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).