From: "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [WIP/RFC PATCH 1/2] Introduce GIT_INDEX_PREFIX
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:15:26 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcaeb9bf0806042015w72295f07k25ad709f5d976b20@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vabi1xepi.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> GIT_INDEX_PREFIX is used to limit write access to a specific directory.
>> Only "important" information is protected by index prefix (those will
>> be used to create tree objects)
>>
>> When GIT_INDEX_PREFIX is set, any attempt to modify the index (refresh
>> it is okay though) will bail out. read-tree and merge, however, can
>> write to full index. For merge, no conflict is allowed outside index
>> prefix.
>
> This is kind of hard to judge as part of "narrow checkout" series, because
> it is not clear how this will actually _help_ narrow checkout.
When you do narrow checkout. You only have a subdirectory, so you
would not want some commands to accidentally change things outside
that subdirectory in index.
> In other words, as a standalone "protect parts outside a single
> subdirectory" it can be reviewed and judged, but it is unclear how it
> would help narrow checkout if you excempted only a _single_ subdirectory.
> E.g. you might want to limit yourself to arch/x86 _and_ include/asm-x86.
Well it could be extended to support multiple path separated by colon
later if someone needs it :)
> I sympathize that this series will be hard to get right as the places _you
> identify_ in the code as "touching index entries" are the only places that
> you _could_ write test scripts for --- if you missed one codepath it would
> be easy for you to forget writing the test for that codepath.
>
> Having said that...
>
>> @@ -71,6 +73,9 @@ static void setup_git_env(void)
>> git_graft_file = getenv(GRAFT_ENVIRONMENT);
>> if (!git_graft_file)
>> git_graft_file = xstrdup(git_path("info/grafts"));
>> + index_prefix = getenv(INDEX_PREFIX_ENVIRONMENT);
>> + if (index_prefix && (!*index_prefix || index_prefix[strlen(index_prefix)-1] != '/'))
>> + die("GIT_INDEX_PREFIX must end with a slash");
>
> Not nice (aka "why 'must'?").
Simpler handling. Maybe it should append slash by itself if missing.
>> diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c
>> index ac9a8e7..4f8d44b 100644
>> --- a/read-cache.c
>> +++ b/read-cache.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,11 @@
>>
>> struct index_state the_index;
>>
>> +static int outside_index_prefix(const struct index_state *istate, const char *ce_name)
>> +{
>> + return istate == &the_index && get_index_prefix() && prefixcmp(ce_name, get_index_prefix());
>> +}
>
> The first check above needs to be justified.
>
> If you say "outside of this path are off-limits", why do you allow a
> temporary index that is used during a partial commit and other
> index_states excempt from that rule?
Because unpack_trees writes new index from scratch so it will always
violate that. That check is IMO enough for simple index manipulation
like add/remove an entry. For unpack_trees, I have
check_index_prefix() to match a temporary index with current index
before it gets written to disk.
Yes I did miss partial commit. Did not know it used temporary index too.
> [the rest]
OK will do.
--
Duy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-05 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-04 16:28 [WIP/RFC PATCH 1/2] Introduce GIT_INDEX_PREFIX Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2008-06-04 18:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-05 3:15 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [this message]
2008-06-05 4:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-05 12:03 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fcaeb9bf0806042015w72295f07k25ad709f5d976b20@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).