From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" Subject: Re: Hackontest ideas? Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:12:04 +0700 Message-ID: References: <20080729000103.GH32184@machine.or.cz> <7vk5f5o6em.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080729011404.GI32184@machine.or.cz> <20080729020212.GI10151@machine.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Junio C Hamano" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Petr Baudis" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 29 04:13:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNei7-0007GI-5n for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:13:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753020AbYG2CMJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:12:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752326AbYG2CMI (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:12:08 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:22351 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752072AbYG2CMG (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:12:06 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so2225469fgg.17 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:12:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Or9J/M84a4aUv/wTsr8vt0PtIw57VqOwqiyjrNhL+eE=; b=Bh5gmkQSP9P0v2T2GXrMFvxSU2mHZXa89mxhm4/ktynsjDR9yHt78337liII2kAzE1 Iy8Vwji8gmsxEQ4m3NuzA4ARPRKyIIiShTLq6FS+atNTnSk+g9Dq1lfZ5y/lH5LfipIt 6oYVIAXAUOsKtlU67wGvm3XCrPZeK8amDYSoA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=dQevTsbhWtWf5txMQcItVbveLuX+wq4CGin7sAk/b2a/ug/jxr6SCKGFxZGVdVoeYb 8vid0nFIeDRJQTrxZVp27gNBgXSLw/8skIqW3bYeQYHJIgxPyXOQqAJL+e+rxbsGbE6S K+ITg1AVNmJDwtgsMvgq1C1nahUpjEeBISiTg= Received: by 10.86.63.19 with SMTP id l19mr3191191fga.60.1217297524527; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:12:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.91.2 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:12:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20080729020212.GI10151@machine.or.cz> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 7/29/08, Petr Baudis wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 08:55:32AM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > > On 7/29/08, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 05:55:45PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > Petr Baudis writes: > > > > > > > > > (What feature in Git or a Git-related tool would you implement, given 24 > > > > > hours staight and unlimited pizza supply?) > > > > > > > > "Use 'assume unchanged' bit to implement narrow checkout". > > > > > > > > > I think Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy is already working on this? (Though I think > > > he does not use the assume unchanged bit; but this will be likely done > > > before the end of September.) > > > > You are welcome to do ;) I got to narrow checkout from subtree > > checkout where 'assume unchanged' bit was unapplicable so my approach > > is a bit different, but probably 'assume unchanged' bit is the right > > way to go. > > > But I rather liked the elegancy of just narrowing this down to a > particular subtree. Is there really a good reason to generalize this > further? I think because it's doable and people do need to narrow to more than one subtree sometimes. Also it would solve ".git* in parent directories" problem that is really hard if you strictly do "narrow down to a particular subtree". -- Duy