From: "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: "Miklos Vajna" <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Cc: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
"Karl Chen" <quarl@cs.berkeley.edu>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dropping core.worktree and GIT_WORK_TREE support
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:52:11 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcaeb9bf0808250652p3d0f483dt714cd68d3122d7c9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080825125205.GB23800@genesis.frugalware.org>
On 8/25/08, Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 08:05:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> > > Does this include removing of --work-tree as well?
> > >
> > > The git backend of Pootle (http://translate.sourceforge.net/wiki/) uses
> > > it.
> >
> > Interesting. Does it use it because it can (meaning, --work-tree is
> > supposed to work), or because --work-tree is the cleanest way to do what
> > it wants to do (if the feature worked properly, that is, which is not the
> > case)?
>
>
> It's like:
>
> The current working directory is like
> /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Pootle. The git repository is under
> /some/other/path/outside/usr.
>
> Then Pootle has two possibilities:
>
> 1) save the current directory, change to /some/other, execute git, and
> change the directory back
>
> 2) use git --work-tree / --git-dir
>
> I guess the second form is more elegant. Of course if it is decided that
> this option will be removed then the old form can be still used, but I
> think that would be a step back.
>
>
> > > Also, here is a question:
> > >
> > > $ git --git-dir git/.git --work-tree git diff --stat|tail -n 1
> > > 1443 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 299668 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > So, it's like it thinks every file is removed.
> > >
> > > But then:
> > >
> > > $ cd git
> > > $ git diff --stat|wc -l
> > > 0
> > >
> > > is this a bug, or a user error?
> >
> > I think it is among the many other things that falls into "the two
> > attempts still haven't resolved" category.
>
>
> I'm unfamiliar with this part of the codebase, so in case somebody other
> could look at it, that would be great, but I'm happy with write a
> testcase for it. (Or in case nobody cares, I can try to fix it, but that
> may take a bit more time.)
Because "git diff" did not call setup_work_tree(). The same happens
for "git diff-index" that someone reported recently. IIRC "git
diff-files" has the same problem.
--
Duy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-25 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-22 4:14 [PATCH] Support "core.excludesfile = ~/.gitignore" Karl Chen
2008-08-22 16:58 ` Eric Raible
2008-08-22 17:56 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-08-22 21:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-24 8:40 ` Karl Chen
2008-08-24 18:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-24 22:08 ` Jeff King
2008-08-24 22:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-24 23:13 ` Jeff King
2008-08-24 23:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-24 23:51 ` limiting relationship of git dir and worktree (was Re: [PATCH] Support "core.excludesfile = ~/.gitignore") Jeff King
2008-08-25 0:30 ` Dropping core.worktree and GIT_WORK_TREE support (was Re: limiting relationship of git dir and worktree) Junio C Hamano
2008-08-25 2:00 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-08-25 3:05 ` Dropping core.worktree and GIT_WORK_TREE support Junio C Hamano
2008-08-25 12:52 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-08-25 13:52 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [this message]
2008-08-25 14:43 ` [PATCH] git diff/diff-index/diff-files: call setup_work_tree() Miklos Vajna
2008-08-25 14:46 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-08-25 14:50 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-08-25 15:11 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-08-25 15:26 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-08-26 23:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-28 13:02 ` [PATCH] diff*: fix worktree setup Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2008-08-25 21:21 ` Dropping core.worktree and GIT_WORK_TREE support Junio C Hamano
2008-08-25 21:37 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-08-26 7:35 ` Dropping core.worktree and GIT_WORK_TREE support (was Re: limiting relationship of git dir and worktree) Michael J Gruber
2008-08-27 0:49 ` Jeff King
2008-08-25 19:07 ` [PATCH v2] Support "core.excludesfile = ~/.gitignore" Karl Chen
2008-08-26 6:42 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-08-27 0:25 ` Jeff King
2008-08-27 3:12 ` Karl Chen
2008-08-27 5:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-28 9:09 ` [PATCH v3] Expand ~ and ~user in core.excludesfile, commit.template Karl Chen
2008-08-29 3:26 ` Jeff King
2008-08-29 4:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-29 9:29 ` [PATCH v4] " Karl Chen
2008-08-29 16:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-29 19:01 ` Karl Chen
2008-08-29 19:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-29 22:34 ` Karl Chen
2008-08-30 5:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-30 6:02 ` Jeff King
2008-08-29 7:00 ` [PATCH v3] " Johannes Sixt
2008-08-27 3:18 ` [PATCH v2] Support "core.excludesfile = ~/.gitignore" Karl Chen
2008-08-27 4:50 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fcaeb9bf0808250652p3d0f483dt714cd68d3122d7c9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=quarl@cs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=vmiklos@frugalware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).