Re: [RFC/PATCH] t7011: Mark fixed test as such

[Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>]

On 11/30/09, Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote:
>  Regarding 16/17: Seeing a FIXED is very misleading. I caught it during
>  my work on a patch series and was confused. FIXED usually occurs only
>  while working on a fix, before adjusting the test. So, unless the reroll
>  of nd/sparse is to happen very soon, I still suggest marking it as
>  expect_success as proposed, and then modifying the test during the reroll.

I won't work on it until this weekend. If you insist, then better put
command "true" after test_must_fail to indicate that the test is
broken (could be line-wrapped by gmail, but it's simple enough to
recreate)

diff --git a/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh b/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh
index e996928..da8dcbb 100755
--- a/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh
+++ b/t/t7011-skip-worktree-reading.sh
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ test_expect_failure 'commit on skip-worktree
absent entries' '
 	git reset &&
 	setup_absent &&
 	test_must_fail git commit -m null 1
+	true
 '

 test_expect_failure 'commit on skip-worktree dirty entries' '
-- 
Duy