git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>, Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: display dirty submodule working directory in git gui and  gitk
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 00:51:36 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fcaeb9bf1001040951r3f797750o5ebd25e93c0272ea@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.1001041038520.4985@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>

On 1/4/10, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> The real problem is that submodules in the current form are not very well
>  designed.  For example, a submodule being at a different commit than in
>  the superproject's index is not as fatal as the submodule having changes.
>
>  So in the long run, IMHO a proper redesign of the submodules would not
>  make only a little sense (it does not help, though, that those who
>  implemented and furthered the current approach over other discussed
>  approaches do not use submodules themselves -- not even now).
>
>  In ths short run, we can paper over the shortcomings of the submodules by
>  introducing a command line option "--include-submodules" to
>  update-refresh, diff-files and diff-index, though.

Incidentally I was just drafting git-super.sh it see how far it goes.
The goal was to implement some cross-module operations over time. "git
super status", "git super commit" and others could be handy.
-- 
Duy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-04 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-02 15:33 RFC: display dirty submodule working directory in git gui and gitk Jens Lehmann
2010-01-04  9:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-04 10:44   ` Heiko Voigt
2010-01-04 11:46     ` submodules, was " Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-04 18:29       ` Avery Pennarun
2010-01-04 19:14         ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-04 17:04   ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-04 22:29     ` submodules' shortcomings, was " Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-04 22:27       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2010-01-04 22:35         ` Avery Pennarun
2010-01-04 22:53       ` Avery Pennarun
2010-01-05  8:11       ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-05  9:33         ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-05 10:07           ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-05 11:57           ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-05 18:31             ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-05 20:01               ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-06  1:04                 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-06 14:05                   ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-06 17:01                     ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-06 17:23                       ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-01-06 17:55                         ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-06 18:22                           ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2010-01-06 18:32                           ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-06 20:01                             ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-06 21:19                               ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-06 18:20                       ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-05 23:02               ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-05  9:46         ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-05 12:19           ` Jens Lehmann
2010-01-05 14:27           ` Heiko Voigt
2010-01-05 15:07             ` Johan Herland
2010-01-05 15:30             ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-05 22:37             ` Nanako Shiraishi
2010-01-05 23:13               ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-07 11:04                 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2010-01-05 20:38       ` Pau Garcia i Quiles
2010-01-05 23:06         ` cmake, was Re: submodules' shortcomings Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-06  1:17           ` Pau Garcia i Quiles
2010-01-06  4:25             ` Miles Bader
2010-01-06  9:24             ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-01-04 17:51   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [this message]
2010-01-04 18:40     ` RFC: display dirty submodule working directory in git gui and gitk Jens Lehmann
2010-01-04 19:05       ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-04 19:21         ` Jens Lehmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fcaeb9bf1001040951r3f797750o5ebd25e93c0272ea@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=hjemli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hvoigt@hvoigt.net \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).