From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49466C433F5 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 23:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239546AbiCGX2E (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2022 18:28:04 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60920 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343914AbiCGX1x (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Mar 2022 18:27:53 -0500 Received: from smtp.hosts.co.uk (smtp.hosts.co.uk [85.233.160.19]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91C8B2655A for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2022 15:26:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from host-84-13-159-41.opaltelecom.net ([84.13.159.41] helo=[192.168.1.37]) by smtp.hosts.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1nRMki-00026A-AV; Mon, 07 Mar 2022 23:26:56 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 23:26:56 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rebase: `preserve` is also a pull option, tell dying users Content-Language: en-GB To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= , Philip Oakley via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org References: <220222.868ru27vtt.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> <3e144b59-dce2-ce10-cd9b-eca92eee922c@iee.email> <220223.86mtih6fai.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> <8bd89179-e94b-cc13-6373-1aa9fb539e59@iee.email> From: Philip Oakley In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi Dscho, On 07/03/2022 16:43, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Philip, > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2022, Philip Oakley wrote: > >> I'll have another look at the ways these edge cases could appear, and >> try an improve the commit message explanations where the diff doesn't >> show sufficient context. It'll be at least next week. > Can I punt this patch series back to you? (I sent it upstream on your > behalf because I had assumed that you'd want me to, sorry for > misunderstanding your intentions.) > I'm happy to continue to work on this series, and am grateful for your support in pushing it through GGG. How is it best to transfer the 'ownership' at GGG? I've still got some family issues so it'll be later in the week, or even next week before I can update the series. Thanks. Philip