Re: [PATCH v15 0/7] branch: delete-merged

[Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>]

Hi Harald

On 17/06/2026 20:11, Harald Nordgren wrote:
>> Right but you sent that version a few hours after I'd posted a partial
>> review which concluded by saying I'd finish it the next day. If you send
>> a new version when you are waiting for further comments it clutters the
>> list because you know you're going to have to post another revision when
>> you get the rest of the comments. Anyone reviewing the interim version
>> is wasting their time. When you receive review comments, by all means
>> start thinking about them and updating your local copy but please don't
>> post a new version until the discussion on the previous version has
>> settled down.
> 
> That's fair. Sorry about that.
> 
> Will you let me know when your review here is finished?

I've just sent a mail with another comment but that concudes this round 
unless you have any questions about it.

> 
> I received the same feedback from Junio before, so I'm not unaware of
> this problem. I am trying to slow down. I often prepare the work as
> soon as I get some comments -- I'm on paternity leave so I have a lot
> of time when the baby is sleeping -- 

Congratulations - I hope the baby is sleeping at night as well in the day!

> then I actively hold off on
> sending to not overload the rest of you. But at the same time I think
> it's valuable to keep up a certain pace. It's a balancing act.
It is worth waiting for the discussion to settle on each round, I'll try 
and be clear when I've finished looking at each revision. I'm sure other 
folks would appreciate you looking at their patches and commenting on 
them while you're waiting for feedback on yours, especially the GSoC 
project students.

Thanks

Phillip