From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Organov Subject: Remove reference to cogito from core-tutorial.txt? Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:10:35 +0400 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Oct 27 17:11:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IlnJX-0001b8-BJ for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:11:03 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751543AbXJ0PKv (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:10:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751858AbXJ0PKv (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:10:51 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:60162 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751543AbXJ0PKu (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:10:50 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IlnJB-000824-KN for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:10:41 +0000 Received: from 87.236.81.130 ([87.236.81.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:10:41 +0000 Received: from osv by 87.236.81.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2007 15:10:41 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 87.236.81.130 User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hello, In Documentation/core-tutorial.txt at line 554 there is a note that begins with "Most likely, you are not directly using the core git Plumbing commands, but using Porcelain like Cogito..." As stated on , "Cogito was a popular version control system on top of Git, aiming at seamless user interface and ease of use. It provided much better user interface in the past days of Git but by now it is mostly obsolete and currently unmaintained." I think it's not a good idea to have this in the tutorial. Should this entire note be removed, or rewritten using git porcelain commands? If the former, I can make a patch, if the latter, I'm afraid I'm not yet comfortable enough with git to do it right. -- Sergei.