From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-fetch: more terse fetch output
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:02:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fgir54$7ft$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20071103210321.GA25685@glandium.org
Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 04:50:54PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> [ heh, I knew someone would say something ]
>>
>> Yes, to me, 1MB is 1024 KB. Always been, until those idiotic hard disk
>> manufacturers decided to redefine the common interpretation of what
>> everyone else used to consider what a MB is just to boost their
>> marketing claims.
>
> How many grams in a kilogram ? How many meters in a kilometer ? How many
> joule in a kilojoule ? ... How many bytes in a kilobyte ? Oh wait...
>
> And you know what ? It's not only a matter of hard disk manufacturers.
>
> How fast is gigabit ethernet ? Yep, 1000000000 bits/s
> How big would people say a 44000000 bytes file is ? 44MB or 42MB ?
> And my favourite: How many bytes in a 1.44MB floppy disk ? 1474560, that
> is, 1.44 * 1024000.
>
> Those who made this big mess are the ones who decided a KB was 1024
> bytes, not the others.
No, the problem is that in _computer science_ kB (or KB) was 1024 bytes,
and MB was 1024 kilobytes, because 1024 is a power of 2, and for example
naturally the memory which can be adressed comes as a power of 2.
Now in other parts of science k means 1000, and M means 1000000. To make
the computer sciences meaning of kB explicit SI introduced ki and Mi prefix.
And manufacturers claiming HDD size x GB in the SI meaning took part...
--
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-03 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-03 5:32 [PATCH] git-fetch: more terse fetch output Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-03 5:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-03 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-03 20:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-03 20:40 ` Mike Hommey
2007-11-03 20:50 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-11-03 21:03 ` Mike Hommey
2007-11-03 21:46 ` Pierre Habouzit
2007-11-03 22:02 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2007-11-03 22:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-03 23:31 ` Mike Hommey
2007-11-04 0:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-04 1:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-04 1:49 ` David Brown
2007-11-04 2:14 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-11-03 22:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-11-04 9:56 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-04 4:58 ` Jeff King
2007-11-04 13:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-04 14:01 ` Pierre Habouzit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='fgir54$7ft$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).