From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] refactor fetch's ref matching to use ref_abbrev_matches_full_with_rules()
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:55:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fh7548$15u$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 11947897092576-git-send-email-prohaska@zib.de
Steffen Prohaska wrote:
> The old rules used by fetch were coded as a series of ifs. The old
> rules are:
> 1) match full refname if it starts with "refs/" or matches "HEAD"
> 2) verify that full refname starts with "refs/"
> 3) match abbreviated name in "refs/" if it starts with "heads/",
> "tags/", or "remotes/".
> 4) match abbreviated name in "refs/heads/"
>
> This is replaced by the new rules
> a) match full refname
> b) match abbreviated name prefixed with "refs/"
> c) match abbreviated name prefixed with "refs/heads/"
>
> The details of the new rules are different from the old rules. We no
> longer verify that the full refname starts with "refs/". The new rule
> (a) matches any full string. The old rules (1) and (2) were stricter.
> Now, the caller is responsible for using sensible full refnames. This
> should be the case for the current code. The new rule (b) is less
> strict than old rule (3). The new rule accepts abbreviated names that
> start with a non-standard prefix below "refs/".
>
> Despite this modifications the new rules should handle all cases as
> expected. Two tests are added to verify that fetch does not resolve
> short tags or HEAD in remotes.
>
> We may even think about loosening the rules a bit more and unify them
> with the rev-parse rules. This would be done by replacing
> ref_ref_fetch_rules with ref_ref_parse_rules. Note, the two new test
> would break.
Does still "origin" matches "origin/HEAD" if we have emote "origin"?
--
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-11 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-11 14:01 [REPLACEMENT PATCH 0/6] improve refspec handling in push, refactor matching in fetch Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-11 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/6] push: mention --verbose option in documentation Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-11 14:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] push: teach push to pass --verbose option to transport layer Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-11 14:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] push: support pushing HEAD to real branch name Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-11 14:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] add ref_abbrev_matches_full_with_rules() Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-11 14:01 ` [PATCH 5/6] push: use same rules as git-rev-parse to resolve refspecs Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-11 14:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] refactor fetch's ref matching to use ref_abbrev_matches_full_with_rules() Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-11 14:55 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2007-11-11 17:31 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-12 19:51 ` [PATCH 5/6] push: use same rules as git-rev-parse to resolve refspecs Junio C Hamano
2007-11-12 20:48 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-12 19:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] add ref_abbrev_matches_full_with_rules() Junio C Hamano
2007-11-12 20:51 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-11 14:17 ` [PATCH 3/6] push: support pushing HEAD to real branch name Andreas Ericsson
2007-11-11 14:35 ` [REPLACEMENT PATCH " Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-11 14:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] push: mention --verbose option in documentation Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-11 14:14 ` Steffen Prohaska
2007-11-11 19:39 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='fh7548$15u$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).