From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gabriel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make commit, cherry-pick and revert more silent. Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 08:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1199634201-26013-1-git-send-email-g2p.code@gmail.com> <7vir2636tq.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 07 10:00:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JBnqV-0003iM-0Q for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 10:00:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753899AbYAGJAH convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 04:00:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754036AbYAGJAH (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 04:00:07 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:46940 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753519AbYAGJAF (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jan 2008 04:00:05 -0500 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JBnpy-0002CI-JH for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:00:02 +0000 Received: from dhcp26-112.enst.fr ([137.194.26.112]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:00:02 +0000 Received: from g2p.code by dhcp26-112.enst.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:00:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp26-112.enst.fr User-Agent: Pan/0.129 (Benson & Hedges Moscow Gold) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Le Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:52:33 -0800, Junio C Hamano a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: > So a more convincing presentation would be: > ... Will split. > After I wrote all that, I realized that the patch is not acceptable a= s > is. >=20 > Why? >=20 > This makes a successful cherry-pick way too silent. With your patch,= we > will see: >=20 > * "Auto-merged ..." messages that shows what paths are affected > by the cherry-pick/revert (which I do not think we would want to > squelch), >=20 > * "Finished one cherry-pick." >=20 > But we will lose the "Created commit ...: " and " files > changed..." summary, neither of which we would want to lose. I'll have a look. This seems to require refactoring the interface between cherry-pick/ revert and commit. > Also sign your patch (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches), please, w= hen > you try the second round. >=20 > Thanks. Thanks, I appreciate the review.