git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael J Gruber <michaeljgruber+gmane@fastmail.fm>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Git Branding Overview, Re: Git.or.cz Experimental Design
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:59:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <g61q6n$645$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46a038f90807201450w57fdb523m42bc628f2dce7f87@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1798 bytes --]

Martin Langhoff venit, vidit, dixit 20.07.2008 23:50:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:11:02PM -0400, David Baldwin wrote:
>>> http://baldwindev.com/git.or.cz/
>>  I'm not sure if this is really an improvement on the current state,
>> but then again, the current state pretty much matches my idea and maybe
>> others will agree that your proposal is better. Thus, it's better to
>> show this to the Git community at large. :-)
> 
> FWIW, I like it. I like both the better font and whitespace layout and
> the 3-color-spot-merge-to-white. As Petr says, we have had the
> (apologies, but to me) ugly logo for a while, so it is widely used,
> and perhaps it has even grown on people.
> 
> BazaarNG managed to grab the best concept logo of the lot, IMHO, with
> the 'merge' roadsign.
> 
>>  If you think you have a cooler logo, that's fine too, but then it's
>> again better to present it explicitly, I believe.
> 
> Can we separate the 2 things? The better fonts and layout look like a win to me.
> 
> WRT the logo, the current one is not a particularly strong image, and
> we haven't spent millions in plastering it over magazines or anything.
> So a good new logo would be something to take on.

I like that new logo (plusminus G), too, it's very descriptive. I just 
want to raise one question which I can't answer myself:

Are there any potential issues with the Helvetica license?

In any case it may be safer do redo it with a GPL sans serif font. If 
one wants to keep the association of the shape of "G" with a circular 
arrow then FreeSans and Nimbus Sans L seem to be the only options.

Alternatively, it may be easier to redo it in plain PS. I'll attach 2 
KISS variants. 1.5k for the eps, 3 colors only.

Cheers,
Michael

[-- Attachment #2: gitlogo.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 2034 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: gitlogo2.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 2034 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-21 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5fb1d2400807022011w7f8d79dbk68a64dc1b8b01d98@mail.gmail.com>
2008-07-18 10:39 ` Git Branding Overview, Re: Git.or.cz Experimental Design Petr Baudis
2008-07-20 21:21   ` Matt Graham
2008-07-20 21:44   ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-20 22:36     ` Petr Baudis
2008-07-20 21:50   ` Martin Langhoff
2008-07-21 10:59     ` Michael J Gruber [this message]
2008-07-21 11:20       ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-21 12:20         ` Michael J Gruber
2008-07-21 17:23           ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-21 20:03         ` Matt Graham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='g61q6n$645$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=michaeljgruber+gmane@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).