From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sitaram Chamarty Subject: Re: Possibly-spurious 'not uptodate. Cannot merge' Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Organization: disorganised! Message-ID: References: <874p16puuq.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 15 02:06:02 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LC1u8-00061Y-B3 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 02:05:48 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750981AbYLOBER (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:04:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751005AbYLOBEL (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:04:11 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:51829 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750981AbYLOBEJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 20:04:09 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LC1sP-0007lX-TI for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:04:01 +0000 Received: from atcmail.atc.tcs.co.in ([203.200.212.145]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:04:01 +0000 Received: from sitaramc by atcmail.atc.tcs.co.in with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:04:01 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: atcmail.atc.tcs.co.in User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9 (Linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2008-12-14, Nix wrote: > In this situation, 'git diff' reports no changes at all, but 'git reset > --hard' gets the tree back into a state where merging succeeds, as does > 'git update-index --refresh'. Wasn't there some situation in which merely running 'git status' would have a similar effect? I seem to recall reading that somewhere but now I can't find any mention of it in 'git help status'.