From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Zorba" Subject: Re: user manual question Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:51:09 -0000 Message-ID: References: To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 29 01:56:24 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LH6Qh-0007Vk-Rs for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:56:24 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755295AbYL2AzF (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:55:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755246AbYL2AzF (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:55:05 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:54150 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751674AbYL2AzE (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:55:04 -0500 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LH6PO-00078p-HE for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:55:02 +0000 Received: from 81.135.227.136 ([81.135.227.136]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:55:02 +0000 Received: from cr by 81.135.227.136 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:55:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.135.227.136 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org X-Spam-Report: 5.2 points; * 0.0 RCVD_BY_IP Received by mail server with no name * 4.0 RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO Received: contains an IP address used for HELO * 1.2 PRIORITY_NO_NAME Message has priority, but no X-Mailer/User-Agent Archived-At: Hi Dilip, Thanks for sharing that. It makes me feel not so stupid :-) regards > > +1 > > I was (am) was initially confused about head and HEAD and assumed that > they are both same. > > -- dm