From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doki Pen Subject: git-svn fetch Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 29 17:15:18 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MA3ng-0006AL-CK for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 17:15:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760252AbZE2PPD (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2009 11:15:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759845AbZE2PPD (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2009 11:15:03 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:55768 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758210AbZE2PPC (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2009 11:15:02 -0400 Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MA3nS-00054v-Mw for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 29 May 2009 15:15:02 +0000 Received: from 209.190.172.178 ([209.190.172.178]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 15:15:02 +0000 Received: from doki_pen by 209.190.172.178 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 May 2009 15:15:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.190.172.178 User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: I'm sorry if this has been brought up before, I did look through the archive and didn't see it. I am working with a repo that has about 7000 commits and about 100 branches/tags. I've been using git-svn for about 4 months now and love it. The problem I'm experiencing is that everytime a new branch is added, git svn fetch seems to download the entire history all the way from r1. Is this the expected behavior? If so, why is that? Don't we already have the old revisions from trunk and other branches?