From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arkadiusz =?UTF-8?B?TWnFm2tpZXdpY3o=?= Subject: is smarter bisect possible? Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:37:06 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 25 09:45:33 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mr5UU-0007Tp-2v for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:45:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752633AbZIYHpH convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:45:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752602AbZIYHpG (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:45:06 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:60721 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752633AbZIYHpF (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Sep 2009 03:45:05 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Mr5UH-0007Mp-03 for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:45:05 +0200 Received: from 83.238.65.58 ([83.238.65.58]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:45:04 +0200 Received: from arekm by 83.238.65.58 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:45:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Followup-To: gmane.comp.version-control.git X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.238.65.58 User-Agent: KNode/4.3.1 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, I have such problem. Linus kernel tree merged some feature=20 (94e0fb086fc5663c38bbc0fe86d698be8314f82f) that was developed in .31rc9= era. Current Linus kernel tree with that feature merged shows some regressio= n.=20 Tree just before that merge doesn't show regression. Now if I start to bisect just that feature (good=20 b7f21bb2e23b4fec16b448a34889f467465be659, bad=20 94e0fb086fc5663c38bbc0fe86d698be8314f82f) then git gets me whole tree b= ack=20 to .31rc9 era which... doesn't show any problems. This means that only combined current Linus tree and that feature shows= a=20 problem. Is it possible to make git bisect test current tree + parts of that mer= ge=20 instead going back to .31rc9 era with the whole tree? --=20 Arkadiusz Mi=C5=9Bkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/