From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anteru Subject: Re: Deciding between Git/Mercurial Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:10:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200909272001.48180.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> Reply-To: newsgroups@catchall.shelter13.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Sep 27 20:11:13 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MryDI-00080u-Fn for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:11:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750890AbZI0SK6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:10:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750844AbZI0SK6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:10:58 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:45797 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750803AbZI0SK5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:10:57 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MryD7-0007wU-5X for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:11:01 +0200 Received: from lmontsouris-156-26-18-33.w80-14.abo.wanadoo.fr ([80.14.177.33]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:11:01 +0200 Received: from newsgroups by lmontsouris-156-26-18-33.w80-14.abo.wanadoo.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:11:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lmontsouris-156-26-18-33.w80-14.abo.wanadoo.fr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) In-Reply-To: <200909272001.48180.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Robin Rosenberg wrote: > You have to read carefully. This (or the mercurial list) may not be the > most objective sources of information. Sure, but at the moment, I'm advocating pro-git, so I'm biased as well :) > Might be somewhat true, but msysgit works very well. Not sure how > mercurial handles unicode issues. CRLF issues seems to be ignored (not handled). Yeah, well, the main question here is actually: Is improved support for Windows one of the goals of future git development, or is this a complete non-issue? Cheers, Anteru