From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lorenzo Bettini Subject: Re: pushing remote branches Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:27:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2e24e5b90911141645n59680856ja21f2f3c7063f7c0@mail.gmail.com> <2e24e5b90911150304i1472ed13k6c60611ef2e9ba19@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 16 16:28:57 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NA3VP-00074I-Jo for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:28:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752842AbZKPP21 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:28:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752790AbZKPP20 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:28:26 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:60067 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751634AbZKPP20 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:28:26 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NA3Uz-0006kP-6P for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:28:13 +0100 Received: from nat2.di.unito.it ([130.192.156.245]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:28:13 +0100 Received: from bettini by nat2.di.unito.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:28:13 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: nat2.di.unito.it User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) In-Reply-To: <2e24e5b90911150304i1472ed13k6c60611ef2e9ba19@mail.gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sitaram Chamarty wrote: > >> Thus, if I had >> >> [remote "origin"] >> fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* >> url = git@... >> [branch "master"] >> remote = origin >> merge = refs/heads/master >> [branch "experiments"] >> remote = origin >> merge = refs/heads/experiments >> >> instead of >> >> [remote "origin"] >> fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* >> url = git://... >> [branch "master"] >> remote = origin >> merge = refs/heads/master >> [branch "experiments"] >> remote = origin >> merge = refs/heads/experiments >> >> I would have been able to push also to branch experiments? Without having >> to add >> >> [remote "experiments"] >> url = git@... >> fetch = +refs/heads/experiments:refs/remotes/experiments/experiments >> >> ? > > (by the way: do you mean refs/remotes/origin/experiments in that last > line above?) > no, it's just like I wrote it... you mean in [remote "experiments"] url = git@gitorious.org... fetch = +refs/heads/experiments:refs/remotes/experiments/experiments or in [branch "experiments"] remote = origin merge = refs/heads/experiments ? > Anyway to answer your question, I do not see the refspec line as the issue > here, but the URL for the repo, which determines how you access it. so this would have been enough: >> [remote "origin"] >> fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* >> url = git://... >> [branch "master"] >> remote = origin >> merge = refs/heads/master >> [branch "experiments"] >> remote = origin >> merge = refs/heads/experiments ? thanks Lorenzo -- Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com