From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: equal-tree-merges as way to make rebases fast-forward-able Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:31:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 30 16:32:18 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NF8Eb-0001yW-FV for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:32:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752187AbZK3PcG (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:32:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752107AbZK3PcE (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:32:04 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:38062 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752018AbZK3PcD (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:32:03 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NF8ES-0001vD-5y for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:32:08 +0100 Received: from 93-34-210-248.ip51.fastwebnet.it ([93.34.210.248]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:32:08 +0100 Received: from bonzini by 93-34-210-248.ip51.fastwebnet.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:32:08 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-34-210-248.ip51.fastwebnet.it User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090922 Fedora/3.0-3.9.b4.fc12 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b4 In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 11/30/2009 03:43 PM, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > The itch this idea is supposed to scratch is the problem that a rebase > or a amended commit is no longer a fast-forward, so cannot be easily > pulled. How does this compare with topgit? Paolo