From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vitaly Berov Subject: Re: git clone: very long "resolving deltas" phase Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:05:54 +0400 Message-ID: References: <4BBC1ED3.6020008@gmail.com> <4BBECE44.4040608@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 10 10:06:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0ViC-0001O6-Ul for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:06:41 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751108Ab0DJIGh (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:06:37 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:35244 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751026Ab0DJIGd (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Apr 2010 04:06:33 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0Vi2-0001Jz-4w for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:06:30 +0200 Received: from 195.218.191.171 ([195.218.191.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:06:30 +0200 Received: from vitaly.berov by 195.218.191.171 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:06:30 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.218.191.171 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9pre) Gecko/20100217 Shredder/3.0.3pre In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 04/09/2010 12:13 PM, Matthieu Moy wrote: > Vitaly Berov writes: > >> Objects amount: 3997548. >> Size of the repository: ~57Gb. > [...] >> By the way, we have a large amount of binary files in our rep. > > This is clearly not the kind of repositories Git is good at. Hmm.. I'm looking for a good repository because I'm tired of subversion, Perforce isn't an option to (very expensive and even more uncomfortable). It seems like there only Git/Mercurial are good options. Can you recommend some other scms? > I encourage you to continue this discussion, and try to find a way to > get it working, but the standard approach (probably a "my 2 cents" > kind of advices, but ...) would be: > > * Split your repo into smaller ones (submodules ...) > > * Avoid versionning binary files I can't get rid of binary files because they are the "sources" of our artists work (the develop a game). Splitting a repo can be an option, but it's very inconvenient for us. Vitaly