From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramkumar Ramachandra Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Documentation/urls: Rewrite to accomodate ::
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 09:29:54 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1271552047-sup-9523@kytes> <20100418025940.GA2249@progeny.tock> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Git Mailing List , Ilari Liusvaara , Daniel Barkalow , Gabriel Filion , Sverre Rabbelier , Michael J Gruber , Junio C Hamano To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Apr 18 06:00:24 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3LgF-0003ne-Qe for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 06:00:24 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750815Ab0DREAR convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Apr 2010 00:00:17 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f217.google.com ([209.85.217.217]:33835 "EHLO mail-gx0-f217.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750699Ab0DREAP convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Apr 2010 00:00:15 -0400 Received: by gxk9 with SMTP id 9so2365783gxk.8 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:00:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QJ6jQbkSGUZeFD4yfBrfGMSm9m+16iojWjC7qB67834=; b=x4BRFbGfXgy1WkF8LS3C9WY/+v3HDIz3LxdJx3t8ZSlGEbwm7NzmrbPrPTpasAxIzB e3lwtR7GdHY3om0QrPmbFPCB/bvLZWvRJqg/aknUizNMoY+uku0xtR3GlvbCaS49SiaK L8O1cHyC8XbrUbFweAqhoalgQJibpjbiXuQUY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lKe9Auu7YYhn00hgVD6EpDr7Gu0fUeYm8G0svmI82ei8DUAej8nLec4Ak/zqPE3bIt LN4Eb5ZKMC3d/JuYc180TdLe2RfLFd/KC3K/r79xvxu66SRUdT42oDr2HPxOaI6fcvka f7gZJ9ZQ4xsZefIrzVxgne/AdRi/6jVz8pmJE= Received: by 10.90.69.14 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:59:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100418025940.GA2249@progeny.tock> Received: by 10.91.154.4 with SMTP id g4mr2102096ago.26.1271563214191; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, > Hmm: if it is not built in to the git binary, is it right to call the > support native? =C2=A0I don=E2=80=99t mean to say HTTP support is a s= econd-class > citizen (with http-backend on the server side, it isn=E2=80=99t any m= ore), but > it is possible that remote-http is not installed on a system. =C2=A0A= lso, it > is a good example to introduce remote helpers with. By "native", I meant that no special remote helpers are necessary (it would be with svn, for example). Does the technical detail of whether the support is built into the main Git binary need to enter the documentation? Thanks for the review! :) I'll post a fixup patch soon. -- Ram