From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Norman Subject: Re: Does recent 'smart' HTTP feature help git-svn thru unfriendly corp. firewalls too? Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 10:20:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20100505141636.GG11053@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 05 16:21:03 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O9fTC-0003NK-CW for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 16:21:02 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932188Ab0EEOU5 convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2010 10:20:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:38398 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755321Ab0EEOUz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2010 10:20:55 -0400 Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so360267wyb.19 for ; Wed, 05 May 2010 07:20:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/FtK40PlVpBwQf9W5OMwVLugcjpaxf8WL1M4JssWA0k=; b=ntUUVr86sDHDyN7otuH/Sr62004Hzzi34PB64ON24hT1Iel31ygyZh9lxjfRXlNcvb M/wuFBsm0uqEMbl5tCtJmvtktTLTRGOd2gtCFFMWggryFnRNOe4aOAf5yYpUaX7sByRQ 6F5x96r6e2zJumD1BFXY58R0mJb1/vKus+hUU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fNr7F84lCT9wGB6UQ4aWAmSSWfjVUYZCUv1yIDnlP3sB6Ao+a/p9cXVBAjDdM0aI2E lK4H+mPc8KQHH8ILaIYVL/7TF/gUHqM95Cg2g/bmRrZ+LS18JKxEQls3CQMvmt3dB4Pa jlm8qcMpyrpHYc0wk0XDpjOjDS/wYddEeYkNI= Received: by 10.216.86.14 with SMTP id v14mr1281716wee.157.1273069253024; Wed, 05 May 2010 07:20:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.186.148 with HTTP; Wed, 5 May 2010 07:20:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100505141636.GG11053@spearce.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sigh - most SVN installations require ssh+svn for read/write access. Our company is changing firewall vendors and I have been told that our TortoisePlink+putty-session 'trick' may be blocked :-( On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Shawn O. Pearce = wrote: > Michael Norman wrote: >> Subject line says it all - does it help? > > Not sure I can see how/why. =A0The smart HTTP code helps git go > through a firewall, not SVN. =A0SVN already speaks HTTP, just > somewhat inefficiently. > > -- > Shawn. >