From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Neal Kreitzinger" Subject: when does git start caring about symlinks? Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:50:31 -0600 Message-ID: To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 24 00:52:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PL2f8-0002Fb-UK for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:52:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754692Ab0KWXwQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:52:16 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33724 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754379Ab0KWXwG (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:52:06 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PL2eb-00023q-HC for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:52:05 +0100 Received: from 67.63.162.200 ([67.63.162.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:52:05 +0100 Received: from neal by 67.63.162.200 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:52:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.63.162.200 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: I have a question on how symlinks work and at what point git starts caring about them. If dirA/repoA/.git has no symlinks and I copy it to dirB/repoB/.git (ie. cp -rp /dirA/repoA/.git /dirB/repoB/.git), but /dirB is a symlink to /x/dirB does that mean that repoB contains symlinks (I suspect that repoB may be made up of all symlinks at this point)? In other words, if I parallel test repoA and repoB am I running a true parallel test or are the repos different because repoA has no symlinks and repoB has symlinks? v/r, Neal