From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcin =?iso-8859-2?q?Wi=B6nicki?= Subject: Re: gitattributes don't work Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 02:16:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 04 03:17:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZwSM-00063x-5y for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 03:17:02 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751257Ab1ADCQ5 convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2011 21:16:57 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:47553 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751181Ab1ADCQ5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jan 2011 21:16:57 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PZwSG-00062R-0T for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 03:16:56 +0100 Received: from static-78-8-147-77.ssp.dialog.net.pl ([78.8.147.77]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 03:16:56 +0100 Received: from mwisnicki by static-78-8-147-77.ssp.dialog.net.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 03:16:56 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: static-78-8-147-77.ssp.dialog.net.pl User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies; GIT 3b0ee7d master) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 11:34:00 +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > 2011/1/3 Marcin Wi=C5=9Bnicki : >> >> According to gitattributes(5) it supports patterns from gitignore(5)= =2E >=20 > While gitattributes(5) says that, actually gitattributes and gitignor= e > [snip] > Yeah, it looks like a bug to me. A better way to solve this once and = for > [snip] > For the time being, anyone who changes gitignore should be reminded t= o > consider whether it's applicable to gitattributes and vice versa. I think that for the time being at least the manual page must change to= =20 reflect reality.