From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: DeMarcus Subject: Re: How can I do an automatic stash when doing a checkout? Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:46:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <84ty4ycdcc.fsf@cenderis.demon.co.uk> <4EEF736A.4070802@ira.uka.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 19 22:50:18 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rcl68-0000Lr-IW for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:50:16 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753096Ab1LSVuM (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:50:12 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:53659 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752353Ab1LSVuL (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:50:11 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rcl5y-0000IZ-Pf for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:50:06 +0100 Received: from c83-251-142-66.bredband.comhem.se ([83.251.142.66]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:50:06 +0100 Received: from demarcus by c83-251-142-66.bredband.comhem.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 22:50:06 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c83-251-142-66.bredband.comhem.se User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 In-Reply-To: <4EEF736A.4070802@ira.uka.de> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2011-12-19 18:24, Holger Hellmuth wrote: > On 18.12.2011 16:10, DeMarcus wrote: >>> You probably don't want to use stash. Just commit whatever partial work >>> you've done. >>> >> >> It feels strange doing a commit of partial work. Some of the files may >> not even be supposed to be checked in. > > You have heard of "git commit --amend" ? Makes partial commits really > easy to work with. > > Yes, I know that one. It's just that I know myself, I don't really like to go back rearranging. I prefer to keep things spread out at first and then inserted properly when it's time. But maybe I'm just unused to the git workflow.