Re: [patch 02/16] const-expr.patch

[Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@googlemail.com>]

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Gary V. Vaughan
<git@mlists.thewrittenword.com> wrote:
> Index: b/unpack-trees.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/unpack-trees.c
> +++ b/unpack-trees.c
> @@ -287,9 +287,11 @@ static void add_same_unmerged(struct cac
>  static int unpack_index_entry(struct cache_entry *ce,
>                              struct unpack_trees_options *o)
>  {
> -       struct cache_entry *src[5] = { ce, NULL, };
> +       struct cache_entry *src[5] = { NULL, NULL };

You don't need NULL twice when the array-size is specified, it's just
confusing as the array has 5 elements.

> Index: b/builtin/commit.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/builtin/commit.c
> +++ b/builtin/commit.c
> @@ -717,7 +717,8 @@ static int prepare_to_commit(const char
>
>        if (use_editor) {
>                char index[PATH_MAX];
> -               const char *env[2] = { index, NULL };
> +               const char *env[] = { NULL, NULL };

Why not "const char *env[2] = { NULL };", as it's shorter?

> Index: b/builtin/cat-file.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/builtin/cat-file.c
> +++ b/builtin/cat-file.c
> @@ -118,7 +118,9 @@ static int cat_one_file(int opt, const c
>
>                /* custom pretty-print here */
>                if (type == OBJ_TREE) {
> -                       const char *ls_args[3] = {"ls-tree", obj_name, NULL};
> +                       const char *ls_args[3] = { NULL, NULL, NULL };

Again, you don't need to repeat NULL.

-- 
Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund