From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: rsync update appears broken now Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <86vezs9wy9.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <81b0412b0510200608l61c00ed0yd4dbc00c313665fe@mail.gmail.com> <7vek6f220h.fsf@arte.twinsun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 21 02:31:15 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESkmu-0003lu-33 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:29:36 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964818AbVJUA3e (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:29:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964819AbVJUA3d (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:29:33 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:12254 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964818AbVJUA3d (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:29:33 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ESklW-0003Tr-DH for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:28:10 +0200 Received: from ip-66-80-53-59.lax.megapath.net ([66.80.53.59]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:28:10 +0200 Received: from junkio by ip-66-80-53-59.lax.megapath.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 02:28:10 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 66.80.53.59 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 Firefox/1.0.7) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds osdl.org> writes: > The latest one I have is ea5a65a59916503d2a14369c46b1023384d51645, but if > you had more pushed out at some point that I just didn't happen to pick > up, that may not be the top-most (A). I am reasonably sure that the screw-up was only rewinding one commit too much. I've done the merge so things should look better once mirrors catch up. Thanks for your help.