From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergio Callegari Subject: Re: fsck missing dangling commits that are candidate heads? Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 13:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20070403194750.GG27706@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 04 15:33:18 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HZ5bw-0001Un-0p for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:33:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753806AbXDDNdM (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:33:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753807AbXDDNdM (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:33:12 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:38067 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753806AbXDDNdK (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 09:33:10 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HZ5bi-0002gN-36 for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:33:02 +0200 Received: from 137.204.98.183 ([137.204.98.183]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:33:02 +0200 Received: from scallegari by 137.204.98.183 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:33:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 137.204.98.183 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20060601 Firefox/2.0.0.3 (Ubuntu-edgy)) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sergio Callegari arces.unibo.it> writes: > Many thanks! I was quite sure I was missing something... > At least I am in good company since the fsck man page does not mention the > logs > > Then... is there any shorthand for finding candidate branch-heads (i.e. for > having something like fsck without looking at the logs) ? > I mean, so that git lost-found can take advantage of it... in fact git gc is surely doing the right thing by considering reflogs, but probably git lost-found should not (at least wrt its documentation this script appears to be not in its best shape right now). Sergio