From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Raible Subject: Re: RFC: perhaps a "new file" should not be deleted by "git =?utf-8?b?cmVzZXQJLS1oYXJkIg==?= Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <279b37b20809101212g57e9ad99qbf6fa15888679894@mail.gmail.com> <20080911061454.GA8167@glandium.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 11 22:27:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KdslW-0002O7-AF for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:27:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751980AbYIKU0j (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:26:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751986AbYIKU0j (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:26:39 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:35288 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751676AbYIKU0j (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:26:39 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KdskP-0006tE-Bv for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:26:37 +0000 Received: from adsl-75-24-208-45.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net ([75.24.208.45]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:26:37 +0000 Received: from raible by adsl-75-24-208-45.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:26:37 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 75.24.208.45 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/0.2.149.29 Safari/525.13) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Mike Hommey glandium.org> writes: > Note that reflog only contains references to commit sha1s, so it can't > track index status. Yes I realize that. My point was that the file is entirely gone (except via "git fsck"). I wouldn't expect the reflog to reference it, but I was just mentioning it for completeness (since it's often help in recovering from types of lossage).