From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: 7rans Subject: Re: commit type Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 31 20:22:30 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KvzZh-0002B9-Cl for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:22:25 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751640AbYJaTVM (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:21:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751678AbYJaTVM (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:21:12 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:44009 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751559AbYJaTVM (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:21:12 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KvzYP-0005dK-V1 for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:21:05 +0000 Received: from 216.241.118.70.cfl.res.rr.com ([70.118.241.216]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:21:05 +0000 Received: from transfire by 216.241.118.70.cfl.res.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:21:05 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 70.118.241.216 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.3) Gecko/2008092510 Ubuntu/8.04 (hardy) Firefox/3.0.3) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: David Symonds gmail.com> writes: > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:58 AM, 7rans gmail.com> wrote: > > > Currently I achieve this by adding "[type]" to the end of my commit messages. > > But of course that's less than optimal. > > Why is that less than optimal? It seems a lot less intrusive than what > you suggest. Because it becomes formalized. Which means people can write tools other people can use to work with them. Having the type embedded in commit message not only clutters up the commit messages, but different people would do it differently, using different brackets or putting it the start or the end of the message, etc. And of course it would be easier to ask git to list certain types of commits if it knew about them. 7rans.