From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: 7rans Subject: Re: commit type Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 04:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Nov 01 05:16:53 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kw7ut-0005P4-Ry for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 05:16:52 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750738AbYKAEPY (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Nov 2008 00:15:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750722AbYKAEPY (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Nov 2008 00:15:24 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:35752 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750716AbYKAEPX (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Nov 2008 00:15:23 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Kw7tN-0007OD-Vh for git@vger.kernel.org; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:15:17 +0000 Received: from 216.241.118.70.cfl.res.rr.com ([70.118.241.216]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:15:17 +0000 Received: from transfire by 216.241.118.70.cfl.res.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:15:17 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 70.118.241.216 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.3) Gecko/2008092510 Ubuntu/8.04 (hardy) Firefox/3.0.3) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin gmx.de> writes: > So you want to force this onto all Git users? Not at all. It would be a purely optional. You would never even need to know the feature existed if you didn't want to use it. So I'm not sure how that is forcing it upon anyone. Moreover, I suggested it b/c I would find such a feature very useful, and, by extension, thought others might as well. Perhaps others have done something similar, in which case it would be interesting the hear their take, or on the other hand they've never considered it before, but now can consider the potential utility of just such a feature. > If yes: that murmur you hear in the background, it might well be the > collective "thanks, but no thanks" of people who do not want that type of > distinction between different commits. There is no need to make one. It's purely annotative. T.