From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Raible Subject: Re: Problem with large files on different OSes Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20090527215314.GA10362@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 28 06:22:54 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M9X8n-0003By-2M for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 06:22:53 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750907AbZE1EVX (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2009 00:21:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750865AbZE1EVW (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2009 00:21:22 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:35801 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750833AbZE1EVW (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2009 00:21:22 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1M9X7J-0005us-S4 for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 28 May 2009 04:21:22 +0000 Received: from adsl-67-119-194-173.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net ([67.119.194.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 04:21:21 +0000 Received: from raible by adsl-67-119-194-173.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 04:21:21 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 67.119.194.173 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/525.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/1.0.154.65 Safari/525.19) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nicolas Pitre cam.org> writes: > On Wed, 27 May 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > +pack.packDeltaLimit:: > > + The default maximum size of objects that we try to delta. > > The option name feels a bit wrong here, like if it meant the max number > of deltas in a pack. Nothing better comes to my mind at the moment > though. pack.maxDeltaSize sounds weird when said aloud. How about pack.deltaMaxSize? - Eric