From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Kraai Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] imap-send: fix compilation-error on Windows Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 15:42:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1255100682-13952-1-git-send-email-kusmabite@gmail.com> <1255100682-13952-2-git-send-email-kusmabite@gmail.com> <1255100682-13952-3-git-send-email-kusmabite@gmail.com> <1255100682-13952-4-git-send-email-kusmabite@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 09 17:56:55 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MwHpb-0006pN-FI for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:56:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933643AbZJIPum (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:50:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933521AbZJIPum (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:50:42 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:60345 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932946AbZJIPul (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:50:41 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MwHjI-0003DJ-QY for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:50:04 +0200 Received: from 134.217.96.252 ([134.217.96.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:50:04 +0200 Received: from mkraai by 134.217.96.252 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:50:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 134.217.96.252 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.3) Gecko/20090824 Firefox/3.5.3) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Erik Faye-Lund googlemail.com> writes: > +#ifdef DRV_OK > +#undef DRV_OK > +#endif > + It shouldn't be necessary to check whether DRV_OK is defined before undefining it; if it's not defined, undefining it will be a NOP.