From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Brandenburg Subject: Re: Unable to fork off sideband demultiplexer Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 18:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <7vk4d5h3qt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20110601173524.GF7132@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110602192927.GA21262@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110603144907.GA11273@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 03 20:52:54 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QSZUK-0001Q1-J0 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:52:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753983Ab1FCSwr (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:52:47 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:36770 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752361Ab1FCSwr (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:52:47 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QSZUA-0001LQ-QJ for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:52:45 +0200 Received: from pm2-users.caci.com ([204.194.77.3]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:52:42 +0200 Received: from randy.brandenburg by pm2-users.caci.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:52:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 204.194.77.3 (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; MS-RTC LM 8)) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King peff.net> writes: > > Thanks, that's a good data point. I know you are probably out of time > for fooling with such things, but if you get a chance, could you try > building also with "-pthreads" in PTHREAD_CFLAGS? I'm wondering if the > problem is as simple as that. > > -Peff > OK, rebuilt with NO_PTHREADS=0 and PTHREAD_CFLAGS=-pthreads and it seems to be working. Just tested quickly for the basics (push and pull). I will be able to test more in depth next week, but I would assume that all will be okay. Hope this helps. -Randy