From: Joachim Schmitz <jojo@schmitz-digital.de>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: read() MAX_IO_SIZE bytes, more than SSIZE_MAX?
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 22:31:39 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20150207T232422-706@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAPc5daUnKcktv0xcz-fGEApckbkQksKuZO53ZL20E1MhtZmn4w@mail.gmail.com
Junio C Hamano <gitster <at> pobox.com> writes:
>
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi <at>
web.de> wrote:
> > I don't know every platform of the planet well enough to be helpful
here,
> > especially the ones which don't follow all the specifications.
> >
> > In other words: As long as we can not guarantee that SSIZE_MAX is
defined,
> > (and is defined to somethong useful for xread()/xwrite() )
> > we should be more defensive here:
> >
> > tweak only on platform where we know it is needed and we know that it
works.
>
> Yup, I agree that is a sensible way to go.
>
> (1) if Makefile overrides the size, use it; otherwise
> (2) if SSIZE_MAX is defined, and it is smaller than our internal
> default, use it; otherwise
> (3) use our internal default.
>
> And leave our internal default to 8MB.
>
> That way, nobody needs to do anything differently from his current build
set-up,
> and I suspect that it would make step (1) optional.
>
something like this:
/* allow overwriting from e.g. Makefile */
#if !defined(MAX_IO_SIZE)
# define MAX_IO_SIZE (8*1024*1024)
#endif
/* for plattforms that have SSIZE and have it smaller */
#if defined(SSIZE_MAX && (SSIZE_MAX < MAX_IO_SIZE)
# undef MAX_IO_SIZE /* avoid warning */
# define MAX_IO_SIZE SSIZE_MAX
#endif
Steps 2 and 3 only , indeed step 1 not needed...
Bye, Jojo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-07 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-07 16:45 read() MAX_IO_SIZE bytes, more than SSIZE_MAX? Joachim Schmitz
2015-02-07 16:48 ` Joachim Schmitz
2015-02-07 17:19 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2015-02-07 17:29 ` Joachim Schmitz
2015-02-07 18:03 ` Joachim Schmitz
2015-02-07 20:32 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2015-02-07 22:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-07 22:31 ` Joachim Schmitz [this message]
2015-02-08 2:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-08 2:32 ` Randall S. Becker
2015-02-08 12:05 ` Joachim Schmitz
2015-02-08 17:09 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-02-11 21:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-11 21:29 ` Joachim Schmitz
2015-02-11 22:05 ` Joachim Schmitz
2015-02-11 23:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-02-07 18:06 ` Randall S. Becker
2015-02-07 18:20 ` Randall S. Becker
2015-02-07 18:36 ` Joachim Schmitz
2015-02-07 19:14 ` Joachim Schmitz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-12 7:46 Joachim Schmitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20150207T232422-706@post.gmane.org \
--to=jojo@schmitz-digital.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).