From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: Trial git RPM's.. Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:39:47 -0600 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 12 04:43:47 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DsAjs-0007i5-68 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 04:43:16 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261919AbVGLCm0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:42:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261841AbVGLCmP (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:42:15 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:33938 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261899AbVGLCj6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:39:58 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j6C2dlFh021680; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:39:47 -0600 Received: (from eric@localhost) by ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6C2dlvl021679; Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:39:47 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com: eric set sender to ebiederm@xmission.com using -f To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:15:52 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> Actually I was looking at doing a git-ident thing that will >> just compute who git thinks you are. And then git-commit-tree can >> just popen it to share code. That looks like how the logic has >> been accomplished in other places. > > I hate popen() if there's a reasonable functional interface in a library. > popen() is damn inefficient for doing something like this that is all C > anyway. Ok two new files then. The new library function, and then the utility that calls it. Eric