From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Cogito-0.12 Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 20:11:22 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20050703234629.GF13848@pasky.ji.cz> <42CBC822.30701@didntduck.org> <20050707144501.GG19781@pasky.ji.cz> <7vk6k2sfa4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , Petr Baudis , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 08 04:12:44 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqiLe-0003id-9n for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 04:12:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261393AbVGHCME (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 22:12:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261387AbVGHCME (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 22:12:04 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:51619 "EHLO ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261393AbVGHCMC (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2005 22:12:02 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j682BOU8012781; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 20:11:24 -0600 Received: (from eric@localhost) by ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j682BMoC012780; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 20:11:22 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com: eric set sender to ebiederm@xmission.com using -f To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Thu, 7 Jul 2005 15:23:11 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds writes: > On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> For optimizing network bandwidth that sounds like the way to go. For >> adhoc development I don't know. For a central sever you still need >> an authenticated way to push content, which makes it another dimension >> of the problem. > > I'm convinced that "ssh" is the only sane way for pushing. If you don't > trust somebody enough to give him ssh access, you shouldn't trust him with > write access to your project in the first place. Agreed, I brought that up only so I could dismiss it :) > So I don't worry about pushing. I think we've got that covered. It's > really the anonymous pulling that needs something. So long as we remember there is a tradeoff between efficiency and ease of setup for anonymous access and small projects. Eric