git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Martin Mares <mj@ucw.cz>, Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>,
	david@lang.hm, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: send-email sending shallow threads by default
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:13:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1bpsxlp8s.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090220032607.GE22419@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu\, 19 Feb 2009 22\:26\:07 -0500")

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 07:03:27PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> > send-email does write a new date header. Which is actually desirable,
>> > IMHO, because otherwise rebased patches would get sent with their
>> > original date, which might very well long in the past (and not only is
>> > that confusing, but it would probably trip spam filters).
>> 
>> Can we ensure that all of the messages sent differ in date by 1 second?
>> Keeping them in order for anyone who looks at the transmit date.
>
> I think it already does:
>
>   $ git show a5370b16
>   commit a5370b16c34993c1d0f65171d5704244901e005b
>   Author: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
>   Date:   Sat Mar 25 03:01:01 2006 -0800
>
>       send-email: try to order messages in email clients more correctly
>
>       If --no-chain-reply-to is set, patches may not always be ordered
>       correctly in email clients.  This patch makes sure each email
>       sent from a different second.

Well that date's my experiments with git-send-email.  And yes looking at the
code the transmit date still appears to be computed that way.

$time = time - scalar $#files;
my $date = format_2822_time($time++);

So it appears that problem has been solved if a person simply sorts by
transmit date.

So it sounds like a good change in defaults to me.

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-20  4:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-15 21:31 [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 21:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 22:56   ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-15 23:39     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-15 23:20 ` Heikki Orsila
2009-02-16  0:04   ` disallowing push to currently checked-out branch Jeff King
2009-02-16  1:33     ` david
2009-02-16  1:47       ` david
2009-02-16  1:30         ` Julian Phillips
2009-02-16  4:01         ` Jeff King
2009-02-16  8:33         ` Daniel Barkalow
2009-02-16  8:51           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 10:17             ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 13:58               ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 17:13                 ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 17:33                   ` Matthieu Moy
2009-02-16 17:43                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 18:48                     ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 20:02                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 21:12                         ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 21:15                           ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 22:28                             ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-16 22:52                               ` Jeff King
2009-02-17  5:53                                 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 11:28                                   ` PUSH_HEAD, was " Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17 17:29                                     ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 19:48                                       ` Jeff King
2009-02-17 22:20                                       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17 22:42                                         ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17 22:54                                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 19:24                     ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-16 20:09                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 21:42                         ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-17  0:07                         ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-17  0:18                           ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17  0:41                             ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-17  0:56                               ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-17  1:18                                 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17  0:57                               ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 21:43                       ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 22:43                         ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 23:23                           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17  0:23                             ` Jeff King
2009-02-17  0:43                               ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-17  1:29                                 ` Jeff King
2009-02-16  3:50       ` Jeff King
2009-02-16  5:05         ` david
2009-02-16  4:05           ` Jeff King
2009-02-16  5:18             ` david
2009-02-16  4:37               ` Jeff King
2009-02-16  5:55                 ` david
2009-02-16  5:06                   ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 10:53                     ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 10:50                   ` dashed commands, was " Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:53 ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible david
2009-02-15 23:01   ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:36     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16  0:14     ` david
2009-02-15 23:18       ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16  0:38         ` david
2009-02-16  0:29           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16 10:23           ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-16 15:33             ` david
2009-02-16 14:40               ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-02-16  0:02       ` disallowing push to currently checked-out branch Jeff King
2009-02-16 10:06         ` Sergio Callegari
2009-02-15 23:01   ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Jakub Narebski
2009-02-15 23:15     ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-15 23:38       ` Jakub Narebski
2009-02-16  0:35       ` david
2009-02-16  0:07   ` send-email sending shallow threads by default Jeff King
2009-02-16  0:09     ` Pieter de Bie
2009-02-16  2:43       ` Jeff King
2009-02-16  2:55         ` Brian Gernhardt
2009-02-16  9:56         ` Wincent Colaiuta
2009-02-16  7:55     ` SZEDER Gábor
2009-02-16 10:38     ` Martin Mares
2009-02-17  8:34       ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-02-17  9:06         ` Martin Mares
2009-02-17 19:28           ` Jeff King
2009-02-20  3:03             ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-20  3:26               ` Jeff King
2009-02-20  4:13                 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2009-02-17  8:30     ` Andreas Ericsson
2009-02-16  1:27   ` [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Sitaram Chamarty
2009-02-16  8:04   ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-02-16  8:49     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16  9:07       ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-02-16  2:42 ` [RFC - draft #2] " Junio C Hamano
2009-02-16  3:20   ` Jeff King
2009-02-16 21:10   ` Jakub Narebski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1bpsxlp8s.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=ae@op5.se \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=mj@ucw.cz \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).