From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: A flaw in dep generation with gcc -MMD? Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:27:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20111118034142.GA25228@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Miles Bader , Jonathan Nieder , Git Mailing List To: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 18 20:27:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RRU5w-0001hS-BA for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:27:28 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755713Ab1KRT1Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:27:24 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:50374 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755407Ab1KRT1X (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:27:23 -0500 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09DD1C1DA11; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:27:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.8.164]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DA61C00101; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:27:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.180]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.8.164]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aEFMTRUe+v3z; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:27:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-105-250.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.105.250]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:27:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id AEF1CCA29C; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:27:17 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: Did I do an INCORRECT THING?? In-Reply-To: (Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy's message of "Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:34:25 +0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy writes: > OK it's not gcc problem. I upgraded to 4.5.3 and still had the same > problem. I used ccache though. Without ccache, gcc produced correct > .o.d files. I'm also using ccache (version 3.1.3) and get correct dependencies. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."