From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG?] push to mirrior interferes with parallel operations
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:29:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m24obd0zpp.fsf@igel.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101119212118.GA19425@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:21:18 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:18:58PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
>> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 08:40:18PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> >
>> >> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > it really only makes sense to push from a non-bare repo,
>> >>
>> >> Why? The repo could itself be a mirror.
>> >
>> > Why do you have a working directory if you are going to have a refspec
>> > that overwrites HEAD behind your back (which, IIRC, git will simply barf
>> > on, so all of your fetches will fail)?
>>
>> I don't understand that question. There is no working directory in a
>> bare repo.
>
> Now I'm confused. I thought we were talking about non-bare repos. Can
> you clarify your question?
You claim that pushing from a bare repo does not make sense, and I
question that (I do that all the time).
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-19 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-18 7:39 [BUG?] push to mirrior interferes with parallel operations Jan Hudec
2010-11-18 17:50 ` Jeff King
2010-11-18 17:58 ` Jeff King
2010-11-18 18:49 ` Does it make sense to pull from mirror? (Re: [BUG?] push to mirrior interferes with parallel operations) Jan Hudec
2010-11-18 19:05 ` Jeff King
2010-11-18 18:42 ` [BUG?] push to mirrior interferes with parallel operations Jan Hudec
2010-11-18 19:04 ` Jeff King
2010-11-19 19:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-11-19 19:46 ` Jeff King
2010-11-19 21:18 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-11-19 21:21 ` Jeff King
2010-11-19 21:29 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2010-11-19 21:51 ` Jeff King
2010-11-19 21:32 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-11-19 21:54 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m24obd0zpp.fsf@igel.home \
--to=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=bulb@ucw.cz \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).