From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: [BUG?] push to mirrior interferes with parallel operations Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:29:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20101118175007.GA26505@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20101118184241.GN3693@efreet.light.src> <20101118190414.GA30438@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20101119194628.GA15466@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20101119212118.GA19425@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jan Hudec , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Nov 19 22:29:36 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJYWU-0007C5-7F for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:29:34 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756886Ab0KSV3Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:29:24 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:59227 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752823Ab0KSV3Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:29:24 -0500 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A021188B5BF; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:29:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-122-42.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.122.42]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD571C02325; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:29:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id D174DCA2A0; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:29:22 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: C'MON, everybody!! I've flown in LESLIE GORE and two dozen KOSHER BUTCHERS! They'll be doing intricate MILITARY MANEUVERS to the soundtrack from "OKLAHOMA"!! In-Reply-To: <20101119212118.GA19425@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:21:18 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2.90 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:18:58PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > >> Jeff King writes: >> >> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 08:40:18PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> > >> >> Jeff King writes: >> >> >> >> > it really only makes sense to push from a non-bare repo, >> >> >> >> Why? The repo could itself be a mirror. >> > >> > Why do you have a working directory if you are going to have a refspec >> > that overwrites HEAD behind your back (which, IIRC, git will simply barf >> > on, so all of your fetches will fail)? >> >> I don't understand that question. There is no working directory in a >> bare repo. > > Now I'm confused. I thought we were talking about non-bare repos. Can > you clarify your question? You claim that pushing from a bare repo does not make sense, and I question that (I do that all the time). Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."