From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Seth Falcon Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Tried to fix git-svn's handling of filenames with embedded '@'. Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 10:47:03 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20060529063543.GA8128@localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 29 19:48:23 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fklpn-0000eM-K7 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 19:47:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751112AbWE2RrI (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2006 13:47:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751136AbWE2RrI (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2006 13:47:08 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.237]:29972 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751112AbWE2RrH (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2006 13:47:07 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i7so927599wra for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:to:subject:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=UL1LdKJnhkOdKp8+kpUysUMIAcP0aFRWXhTVBjyG/E921dibcLkOKcoHkElzxy/h0Kpze2lredtU+euLtUvDCNQfBlhT1l1CdylldR9znebzh4NrfAmjJNRRe15JI0bThOn/9uWtyTA+SfoQe7yP9wHPsM6vvc2B9wx1I6Q+Eq0= Received: by 10.54.83.6 with SMTP id g6mr2364895wrb; Mon, 29 May 2006 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziti.fhcrc.org ( [67.171.24.140]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 27sm4642117wrl.2006.05.29.10.47.06; Mon, 29 May 2006 10:47:06 -0700 (PDT) To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060529063543.GA8128@localdomain> (Eric Wong's message of "Sun, 28 May 2006 23:35:43 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Eric Wong writes: > Seth: how does this work? Your revised patch works for me, thanks. + seth