From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Abrahams Subject: Re: Separate default push/pull? Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:32:37 -0500 Organization: BoostPro Computing Message-ID: References: <20100212001417.GC21930@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7veikrl1m1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jeff King , Chris Packham , David Abrahams , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 12 03:33:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NflLk-0000uo-EQ for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 03:33:44 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757755Ab0BLCck (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:32:40 -0500 Received: from boostpro.com ([206.217.198.21]:57851 "EHLO boostpro.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756811Ab0BLCcj (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:32:39 -0500 Received: from zreba.local (207-172-223-249.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.static.cable.rcn.com [207.172.223.249]) (Authenticated sender: dave) by boostpro.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E75CC14BA9D; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:32:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zreba.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zreba.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7EB1AABF44; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:32:37 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <7veikrl1m1.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.1 (i386-apple-darwin9.8.0) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: At Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:49:26 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Jeff King writes: > > > I think what he would need is a "push.defaultRemote" config option, > > which universally overrides branch.*.remote for pushing. > > Or "branch.*.pushremote". > > But does it really make sense to get changes from one place and send > changes to somewhere completely unrelated? It's not unrelated; it's a publicly-readable clone of the source repo to which I have write permission. After pushing changes there I send a pull request to the owner of the source repo. -- Dave Abrahams Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com